🔗 Share this article

"A significant portion of my personal history is stored on this app, and unexpectedly they want us to cover the cost for it."

One-star feedback and a perception of unfairness have flooded social media conversations since Snapchat joined the most recent technology company to put a price tag on a function that people previously accessed for without payment.

The company behind Snapchat revealed in the fall that it would start charging people if they have exceeding five gigabytes worth of previously shared photos and videos stored as the Memories feature.

Among numerous users, these old snaps serve as a portal to bygone days – leading some to blast the company of "money-hungry tactics" in comments on social media and negative feedback on mobile app marketplaces.

Other Choices

The company has likened its premium storage tiers to those made available by tech giants for mobile devices.

And as an alternative for those who don't want to pay, subscribers can download their saved content – which for many people amount to large volumes – to their personal gadget.

Snap stated that only a small number of subscribers would be affected by the changes.

It also acknowledged that it was "never easy to move from accessing content at no charge to paying for it" – but implied it would be "a valuable investment" for subscribers.

Many criticising the change online seem to disagree.

Widespread Discontent

A web-based protest called the charge a "archival levy", with users calling it "Orwellian" and "absurd" – while an individual threatened to abandon the application from now on.

At the same time, in a poor review on the app marketplace, a user identifying as a pseudonymous user said it felt "morally questionable".

"If I know millennials right, most of us have a long history of memories on this service," they wrote. "And most of us only continued using Snapchat primarily for this purpose. Such limited storage is inadequate when you have a long timeline of recordings... Bye Snap."

Additionally, a London-based user, a 20-year-old journalism student in the UK capital, revealed on the video platform her decision to uninstall the platform.

"I made up my mind that I had to save all my saved content as immediately," she explained. "The vast majority of my teenage years have been documented through my archived posts, all of the images in there are extremely valuable to me."

"This seems illogical to introduce fees people for a feature that has been free for so many years."

Unknown Fees

Snapchat has yet to announce how much storage plans would require in the Britain – only that they are part of a "slow worldwide introduction".

But 23-year-old a different individual, who is based in London, stated in a post on the social platform that she would be "devastated" by these fees.

Amber noted that the service had become "integrated into daily routine" since she began accessing it in the past.

Despite admitting she accepted the app needed to generate revenue, she suggested that the Memories feature is more valuable than the corporation may have understood.

"In my opinion it's a rather unjust move to demand payment from your users who have been consistent and engaged," she said. "These aren't just called Memories, these are our real-life recollections."

Expert Analysis

Companies opting to impose fees from customers for a feature that was previously free is nothing new, and countless individuals cover the cost of services like digital backup services to save their images and clips from their smartphone.

The truth of archiving content in the digital storage – which certain experts in the tech industry often describe as simply "somebody else's computer" – is that it requires funding.

"Storing enormous quantities of saved content on the service isn't a trivial amount," online expert an industry analyst explained. "Snapchat has to seek out a way to fund the operation of archiving, data transfer, back-ups, file sharing, security measures – the entire process."

But the consultant noted that imposing charges for a service that had previously been free, and members had been invited to access as such, may appear as a "deceptive practice" for many people.

"Moving the goalposts after users have accumulated this huge digital archive seems unfair," he noted. And for many, he added, "Saved content is more than stored files, they're personal mementos."

The feeling was shared by those submitting unfavorable comments, with one person calling their archived media "deeply important to me".

"The stored media includes all elements of my life within them from happy occasions such as new additions, grieving for lost relatives, times spent with loved ones, [and] my complete adolescence," they commented.

Expert Analysis

An academic expert, a postdoctoral researcher at Utrecht University in the Holland, stated that Snapchat's move shows the consequences of business-oriented apps being used to store meaningful individual recordings.

"They benefit from this confidence, mutual reliance, and assumption of perpetual availability, which even encourages some users to stay on the service or continue to use it in order to scroll back through their stored media," she explained to the media. "Yet these are not benevolent guardians of private remembrance."