🔗 Share this article The Horror Follow-Up <em>Influencers</em> Could Give Competing Streaming Thrillers Serious FOMO “The entire situation reeks like a bad TV movie,” remarks a cynical commentator during the chilling follow-up Influencers. At that point, his tone is dismissive in a calculated way of a guest whose bizarre tale he previously claimed he believed. But his description of the events in the movie isn't inaccurate. On its face, a pair of films on demand chronicling a woman who worms her way into the lives of social media stars and then murders them seems like the 21st-century equivalent of a tawdry but network-approved Movie of the Week. The surprising aspect regarding Influencers is how much better it proves to be than plenty of its competition, irrespective of where you watch it. It is precisely the thriller capable of giving its peers a bad case of FOMO. Revisiting the First Film and Establishing the Scene 2022’s Influencer follows the enigmatic CW (Cassandra Naud) while she methodically selects solo-traveling social media targets, lures them to their deaths, and conceals those murders (at least temporarily) by seizing control of their socials. The film concludes (spoiler ahead) with CW stranded on an uninhabited island near the coast of Thailand, after her most recent mark, Madison (Emily Tennant), turns the tables against her. This provides the 2025 Influencers some early mystery, when returning writer-director the director picks up with the character CW contentedly residing with her girlfriend Diane (Lisa Delamar) in Paris. On a journey to celebrate the couple’s one-year anniversary, UK-based influencer Charlotte (Georgina Campbell) draws CW's attention and ire. CW comments to Diane that someone should try leaving a phone-addicted online personality in a place without any devices and see whether they can make it. Are we witnessing a backstory prequel? Was CW radicalized after witnessing the special treatment afforded one fame-seeker? Evolving Viewpoints and International Chases The story’s perspective changes multiple times, eventually clarifying those introductory moments' place in the timeline. Harder catches up with Madison, who has been cleared of carrying out CW's offenses, but still faces suspicion regarding her version of what happened, which includes the killing of her boyfriend. We also follow Jacob (Jonathan Whitesell), living in Bali and trying to juice his career as part of a conservative-influencer power couple with Ariana (Veronica Long), although his preferred medium involves masculine-focused livestreams, as opposed to the Instagram photos that normally capture CW's interest. The actor continues to be terrifically magnetic in the part, a role that appears particularly tailor-made to her strengths. (She even created CW's striking wardrobe.) Although the sequel’s focus leans heavily into CW — the first film seemed more balanced between her and Madison — it still functions as a tale of rival investigators, with both women both use fabricated profiles, Insta-stalking, and an apparently unlimited travel budget to chase and/or escape one another. Then again, perhaps the vast resources isn’t necessary. Online personalities possess a knack for gaining access to posh places without paying much, an ability which CW mirrors with her more overt scamming. Ingenious Filmmaking and Visual Wanderlust The creative team for Influencers appear equally ingenious in locating stunning locations to visit, although they were presumably more legitimate in their methods. The vast majority of the movie appears to be shot on location, providing it an authentic gravity that remains even when numerous sequences involve a relatively small cast of people looking at computer or phone screens. It’s the same principle that made the Bond franchise appear so consistently opulent for decades: Yes, big action and special effects can display a big budget, but simply offering a travelogue of sorts to viewers also feels deeply filmic. This is especially fitting for a story so dependent on the simultaneous surface-level allure and desperate hustle of creating envy-inducing digital content. Every character in Bali, like those staying in Thailand in the first film, seem to have access to unbelievably stylish contemporary villas; there are movies concerning beach rescuers that don’t show off as much aerial pool footage. The characters must believably inhabit these lush, remote places to highlight the uneasy irony of how frequently everyone — including the woman exacting revenge on the influencers’ narcissistic falseness — nevertheless devotes much time under the light of their screens. Nuanced Portrayals and Digital-Age Suspense At the same time, the director has not crafted a rant targeting the vacuousness of online fame. Though it can be gratifying to see CW manipulate different internet celebrities, and a Hitchcockian sense of alignment allows us to hope she doesn’t get caught, the filmmaker is somewhat sympathetic to the major influencer characters. Previously, he tapped into the isolation Madison experienced while on ostensibly envy-worthy vacations. Here, the director appears confident that just observing Jacob in action will reveal that he is selling snake-oil masculinity to other gullible men; he resists caricaturing the character. He even grants Jacob a measure of dignity through depicting his genuine loyalty to his girlfriend; he’s a hypocrite, yet Ariana is a collaborator in his hypocrisy, not a victim of it. The flip side of this balanced approach means it may occasionally seem that he’s nodding at bits of modern online life without investigating them further. This is especially true of the way he introduces artificial intelligence into the story, a fascinating turn which misses the psychosexual kick it should have. The pluralized title of Influencers could offer devotees of the original hope for a larger-scale ante-upping, and the movie ultimately delivers that, with an appropriately wild final act. However, initially, it resembles more a sleek Hitchcock thriller than an wild-eyed, tech-addled De Palma-style shocker. Influencers’ heavy use of actual places might also be what prevents it from seeming like utter horror. Our society may be overrun with always-online creators, online fraud, and self-serving tourism, but the world itself is still here, at least for now.