🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots added after that and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously backed the progressive this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on the island with a high participation. I believe there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. So there was some opposition. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.